Legal and ethical implications of wastewater monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 for COVID-19 surveillance.
Date
2020-06-24Journal
Journal of Law and the BiosciencesPublisher
Oxford University PressType
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Scientists have observed that molecular markers for COVID-19 can be detected in wastewater of infected communities both during an outbreak and, in some cases, before the first case is confirmed. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention and other government entities are considering whether to add community surveillance through wastewater monitoring to assist in tracking disease prevalence and guiding public health responses to the COVID-19 pandemic. This scientific breakthrough may lead to many useful potential applications for tracking disease, intensifying testing, initiating social distancing or quarantines, and even lifting restrictions once a cessation of infection is detected and confirmed. Yet, new technologies developed in response to a public health crisis may raise difficult legal and ethical questions about how such technologies may impact both the public health and civil liberties of the population. This paper describes recent scientific evidence regarding COVID-19 detection in wastewater, identifying public health benefits that may result from this breakthrough, as well as the limitations of existing data. The paper then assesses the legal and ethical implications of implementing policy based on positive sewage signals. It concludes that the first step to implementing legal and ethical wastewater monitoring is to develop scientific understanding. Even if reliability and efficacy are established, limits on sample and data collection, use, and sharing must also be considered to prevent undermining privacy and autonomy in order to implement these public health strategies consistent with legal and ethical considerations.Rights/Terms
© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Duke University School of Law, Harvard Law School, Oxford University Press, and Stanford Law School. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.Identifier to cite or link to this item
http://hdl.handle.net/10713/14205ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1093/jlb/lsaa039
Scopus Count
Related articles
- SARS-CoV-2 Titers in Wastewater Are Higher than Expected from Clinically Confirmed Cases.
- Authors: Wu F, Zhang J, Xiao A, Gu X, Lee WL, Armas F, Kauffman K, Hanage W, Matus M, Ghaeli N, Endo N, Duvallet C, Poyet M, Moniz K, Washburne AD, Erickson TB, Chai PR, Thompson J, Alm EJ
- Issue date: 2020 Jul 21
- Ethical and legal challenges posed by severe acute respiratory syndrome: implications for the control of severe infectious disease threats.
- Authors: Gostin LO, Bayer R, Fairchild AL
- Issue date: 2003 Dec 24
- Implementation of environmental surveillance for SARS-CoV-2 virus to support public health decisions: Opportunities and challenges.
- Authors: Medema G, Been F, Heijnen L, Petterson S
- Issue date: 2020 Oct
- Sewage analysis as a tool for the COVID-19 pandemic response and management: the urgent need for optimised protocols for SARS-CoV-2 detection and quantification.
- Authors: Michael-Kordatou I, Karaolia P, Fatta-Kassinos D
- Issue date: 2020 Oct
- Analyzing the Human Rights Impact of Increased Digital Public Health Surveillance during the COVID-19 Crisis.
- Authors: Sekalala S, Dagron S, Forman L, Meier BM
- Issue date: 2020 Dec