Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorKhera, Rohan
dc.contributor.authorPandey, Ambarish
dc.contributor.authorAyers, Colby R
dc.contributor.authorCarnethon, Mercedes R
dc.contributor.authorGreenland, Philip
dc.contributor.authorNdumele, Chiadi E
dc.contributor.authorNambi, Vijay
dc.contributor.authorSeliger, Stephen L
dc.contributor.authorChaves, Paulo H M
dc.contributor.authorSafford, Monika M
dc.contributor.authorCushman, Mary
dc.contributor.authorXanthakis, Vanessa
dc.contributor.authorRamachandran, Vasan S
dc.contributor.authorMentz, Robert J
dc.contributor.authorCorrea, Adolfo
dc.contributor.authorLloyd-Jones, Donald M
dc.contributor.authorBerry, Jarett D
dc.contributor.authorde Lemos, James A
dc.contributor.authorNeeland, Ian J
dc.date.accessioned2020-11-10T16:14:48Z
dc.date.available2020-11-10T16:14:48Z
dc.date.issued2020-10-29
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/14068
dc.description.abstractImportance: Obesity is a global health challenge and a risk factor for atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASVCD). Performance of the pooled cohort equations (PCE) for ASCVD risk by body mass index (BMI; calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared) is unknown. Objective: To assess performance of the PCE across clinical BMI categories. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study used pooled individual-level data from 8 community-based, prospective, longitudinal cohort studies with 10-year ASCVD event follow-up from 1996 to 2016. We included all adults ages 40 to 79 years without baseline ASCVD or statin use, resulting in a sample size of 37 311 participants. Data were analyzed from August 2017 to July 2020. Exposures: Participant BMI category: underweight (<18.5), normal weight (18.5 to <25), overweight (25 to <30), mild obesity (30 to <35), and moderate to severe obesity (≥35). Main Outcomes and Measures: Discrimination (Harrell C statistic) and calibration (Nam-D'Agostino χ2 goodness-of-fit test) of the PCE across BMI categories. Improvement in discrimination and net reclassification with addition of BMI, waist circumference, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP) to the PCE. Results: Among 37 311 participants (mean [SD] age, 58.6 [11.8] years; 21 897 [58.7%] women), 380 604 person-years of follow-up were conducted. Mean (SD) baseline BMI was 29.0 (6.2), and 360 individuals (1.0%) were in the underweight category, 9937 individuals (26.6%) were in the normal weight category, 13 601 individuals (36.4%) were in the overweight category, 7783 individuals (20.9%) were in the mild obesity category, and 5630 individuals (15.1%) were in the moderate to severe obesity category. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) 10-year estimated ASCVD risk was 7.1% (2.5%-15.4%), and 3709 individuals (9.9%) developed ASCVD over a median (IQR) 10.8 [8.5-12.6] years. The PCE overestimated ASCVD risk in the overall cohort (estimated/observed [E/O] risk ratio, 1.22; 95% CI, 1.18-1.26) and across all BMI categories except the underweight category. Calibration was better near the clinical decision threshold in all BMI groups but worse among individuals with moderate or severe obesity (E/O risk ratio, 1.36; 95% CI, 1.25-1.47) and among those with the highest estimated ASCVD risk ≥20%. The PCE C statistic overall was 0.760 (95% CI, 0.753-0.767), with lower discrimination in the moderate or severe obesity group (C statistic, 0.742; 95% CI, 0.721-0.763) compared with the normal-range BMI group (C statistic, 0.785; 95% CI, 0.772-0.798). Waist circumference (hazard ratio, 1.07 per 1-SD increase; 95% CI, 1.03-1.11) and hsCRP (hazard ratio, 1.07 per 1-SD increase; 95% CI, 1.05-1.09), but not BMI, were associated with increased ASCVD risk when added to the PCE. However, these factors did not improve model performance (C statistic, 0.760; 95% CI, 0.753-0.767) with or without added metrics. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that the PCE had acceptable model discrimination and were well calibrated at clinical decision thresholds but overestimated risk of ASCVD for individuals in overweight and obese categories, particularly individuals with high estimated risk. Incorporation of the usual clinical measures of obesity did not improve risk estimation of the PCE. Future research is needed to determine whether incorporation of alternative high-risk obesity markers (eg, weight trajectory or measures of visceral or ectopic fat) into the PCE may improve risk prediction.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23242en_US
dc.language.isoenen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Medical Associationen_US
dc.relation.ispartofJAMA Network Openen_US
dc.subjectatherosclerotic cardiovascular diseaseen_US
dc.subjectpooled cohort equationsen_US
dc.subject.meshBody Mass Indexen_US
dc.subject.meshCohort Studiesen_US
dc.subject.meshObesityen_US
dc.subject.meshOverweighten_US
dc.titlePerformance of the Pooled Cohort Equations to Estimate Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease Risk by Body Mass Index.en_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2020.23242
dc.identifier.pmid33119108
dc.source.volume3
dc.source.issue10
dc.source.beginpagee2023242
dc.source.endpage
dc.source.countryUnited States


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record