Extended use or re-use of single-use surgical masks and filtering facepiece respirators during COVID-19: A rapid systematic review
Author
Toomey, EConway, Y
Burton, C
Smith, S
Smalle, M
Chan, Xhs
Adisesh, A
Tanveer, S
Ross, L
Thomson, I
Devane, D
Greenhalgh, T
Date
2020-10-08Journal
Infection control and hospital epidemiologyPublisher
Cambridge University PressType
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Background: Shortages of personal protective equipment during the COVID-19 pandemic has led to the extended use or re-use of single-use respirators and surgical masks by frontline healthcare workers. The evidence base underpinning such practices warrants examination. Objectives: To synthesise current guidance and systematic review evidence on extended use, reuse, or reprocessing of single-use surgical masks or filtering facepiece respirators. Data sources: World Health Organization, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, and Public Health England websites to identify guidance. Medline, Pubmed, Epistemonikos, Cochrane Database and preprint servers for systematic reviews. Methods: Two reviewers conducted screening and data extraction. Quality of included systematic reviews was appraised using AMSTAR-2. Findings were narratively synthesised. Results: Six guidance documents were identified. Levels of detail and consistency across documents varied. Four high-quality systematic reviews were included: three focused on reprocessing (decontamination) of N95 respirators, one on reprocessing of surgical masks. Vaporised hydrogen peroxide and ultraviolet germicidal irradiation were highlighted as the most promising reprocessing methods, but evidence on the relative efficacy and safety of different methods was limited. We found no well-established methods for reprocessing respirators at scale. Conclusions: There is limited evidence on the impact of extended use and re-use of surgical masks and respirators and gaps and inconsistencies exist in current guidance. Where extended use or reuse is being practiced, healthcare organisations should ensure that policies and systems are in place to ensure these practices are carried out safely and in line with available guidance.Identifier to cite or link to this item
http://hdl.handle.net/10713/13921ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1017/ice.2020.1243
Scopus Count
Related articles
- Decontamination and reuse of surgical masks and N95 filtering facepiece respirators during the COVID-19 pandemic: A systematic review.
- Authors: Seresirikachorn K, Phoophiboon V, Chobarporn T, Tiankanon K, Aeumjaturapat S, Chusakul S, Snidvongs K
- Issue date: 2021 Jan
- Personal protective equipment for reducing the risk of COVID-19 infection among health care workers involved in emergency trauma surgery during the pandemic: An umbrella review.
- Authors: Griswold DP, Gempeler A, Kolias A, Hutchinson PJ, Rubiano AM
- Issue date: 2021 Apr 1
- Decontamination and reuse of N95 filtering facemask respirators: A systematic review of the literature.
- Authors: Rodriguez-Martinez CE, Sossa-Briceño MP, Cortés JA
- Issue date: 2020 Dec
- The COVID-19 pandemic and N95 masks: reusability and decontamination methods.
- Authors: Peters A, Palomo R, Ney H, Lotfinejad N, Zingg W, Parneix P, Pittet D
- Issue date: 2021 May 29
- Gravity steam reprocessing in healthcare facilities for the reuse of N95 respirators.
- Authors: Aljabo A, Mueller E, Abdul-Azeez D, Hoare T, Jain A
- Issue date: 2020 Dec