• Login
    View Item 
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UMB Digital ArchiveCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Using Core Genome Alignments To Assign Bacterial Species

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Chung, Matthew
    Munro, James B
    Tettelin, Hervé
    Dunning Hotopp, Julie C
    Date
    2018-12-04
    Journal
    mSystems
    Publisher
    American Society for Microbiology
    Type
    Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    See at
    https://doi.org/10.1128/mSystems.00236-18
    Abstract
    With the exponential increase in the number of bacterial taxa with genome sequence data, a new standardized method to assign species designations is needed that is consistent with classically obtained taxonomic analyses. This is particularly acute for unculturable, obligate intracellular bacteria with which classically defined methods, like DNA-DNA hybridization, cannot be used, such as those in the Rickettsiales. In this study, we generated nucleotide-based core genome alignments for a wide range of genera with classically defined species, as well as those within the Rickettsiales. We created a workflow that uses the length, sequence identity, and phylogenetic relationships inferred from core genome alignments to assign genus and species designations that recapitulate classically obtained results. Using this method, most classically defined bacterial genera have a core genome alignment that is ≥10% of the average input genome length. Both Anaplasma and Neorickettsia fail to meet this criterion, indicating that the taxonomy of these genera should be reexamined. Consistently, genomes from organisms with the same species epithet have ≥96.8% identity of their core genome alignments. Additionally, these core genome alignments can be used to generate phylogenomic trees to identify monophyletic clades that define species and neighbor-network trees to assess recombination across different taxa. By these criteria, Wolbachia organisms are delineated into species different from the currently used supergroup designations, while Rickettsia organisms are delineated into 9 distinct species, compared to the current 27 species. By using core genome alignments to assign taxonomic designations, we aim to provide a high-resolution, robust method to guide bacterial nomenclature that is aligned with classically obtained results. IMPORTANCE With the increasing availability of genome sequences, we sought to develop and apply a robust, portable, and high-resolution method for the assignment of genera and species designations that can recapitulate classically defined taxonomic designations. Using cutoffs derived from the lengths and sequence identities of core genome alignments along with phylogenetic analyses, we sought to evaluate or reevaluate genus- and species-level designations for diverse taxa, with an emphasis on the order Rickettsiales, where species designations have been applied inconsistently. Our results indicate that the Rickettsia genus has an overabundance of species designations, that the current Anaplasma and Neorickettsia genus designations are both too broad and need to be divided, and that there are clear demarcations of Wolbachia species that do not align precisely with the existing supergroup designations.
    Keyword
    Anaplasma
    Rickettsia
    Rickettsiales
    Wolbachia
    bacterial taxonomy
    core genome alignment
    genomics
    species concept
    Identifier to cite or link to this item
    http://hdl.handle.net/10713/13745
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1128/mSystems.00236-18
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UMB Open Access Articles

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Genome sequence-based criteria for demarcation and definition of species in the genus Rickettsia.
    • Authors: Diop A, El Karkouri K, Raoult D, Fournier PE
    • Issue date: 2020 Mar
    • RNA polymerase beta-subunit-based phylogeny of Ehrlichia spp., Anaplasma spp., Neorickettsia spp. and Wolbachia pipientis.
    • Authors: Taillardat-Bisch AV, Raoult D, Drancourt M
    • Issue date: 2003 Mar
    • Phylogenomic Insight into Salinispora (Bacteria, Actinobacteria) Species Designations.
    • Authors: Millán-Aguiñaga N, Chavarria KL, Ugalde JA, Letzel AC, Rouse GW, Jensen PR
    • Issue date: 2017 Jun 15
    • A phylogenomic and molecular markers based taxonomic framework for members of the order Entomoplasmatales: proposal for an emended order Mycoplasmatales containing the family Spiroplasmataceae and emended family Mycoplasmataceae comprised of six genera.
    • Authors: Gupta RS, Son J, Oren A
    • Issue date: 2019 Apr
    • Phylogenetic framework for the phylum Tenericutes based on genome sequence data: proposal for the creation of a new order Mycoplasmoidales ord. nov., containing two new families Mycoplasmoidaceae fam. nov. and Metamycoplasmataceae fam. nov. harbouring Eperythrozoon, Ureaplasma and five novel genera.
    • Authors: Gupta RS, Sawnani S, Adeolu M, Alnajar S, Oren A
    • Issue date: 2018 Sep
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2023)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Policies | Contact Us | UMB Health Sciences & Human Services Library
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.