Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorSpence, O'Mareen
dc.date.accessioned2020-08-13T15:15:27Z
dc.date.available2020-08-13T15:15:27Z
dc.date.issued2020en_US
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/13541
dc.description2020
dc.descriptionPharmaceutical Health Services Research
dc.descriptionUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore
dc.descriptionPh.D.
dc.description.abstractStatement of the Problem: A common problem among children and adolescents diagnosed with depression who receive care in community settings is that antidepressant regimen changes such as psychotropic augmentation may occur soon after starting treatment. This raises the question as to whether such changes are implemented among youth who would otherwise respond to the antidepressant. Thus, the overarching objectives of this dissertation were to 1) distinguish early in treatment children and adolescents who are likely to respond, and 2) empirically evaluate the association between predicted response and psychotropic augmentation or switching in real world settings. Summary of Methods: Using randomized clinical trial (RCT) data, this research applied a Bayesian approach to predict the likelihood of initial (12 week) and sustained (18 week) response to treatment as a function of early changes in depressive symptoms (i.e. mood, somatic, subjective and behavioral) and other demographic and clinical factors. An innovative application of combined sample multiple imputations (CSMI) was used to estimate the 12-week predicted probability of response among commercially insured adolescents who received care in real-world settings. Each adolescent received a probability of treatment response, which was then used to compare the odds of psychotropic augmentation or switch. Results: Early changes in mood and somatic symptoms within the first six weeks of treatment are primary predictors of initial (at 12 weeks) and sustained (at 18 weeks) response to an antidepressant. Baseline depression severity is an important prognostic factor for initial response, and additional, though minimal improvement, in somatic symptoms from weeks 6 to 12 is indicative of sustained response. In a highly selected cohort of adolescents receiving care in community settings, an augmentation or switch occurred similarly among adolescents with a high versus low likelihood of responding to fluoxetine. Conclusion: The results suggest that other factors beyond expected antidepressant response (or lack thereof) might influence current treatment practices. Our findings have clinical and public health implications that support measurement-based care in pediatric depression. Our application of CSMI highlights several key areas of consideration for future pharmacoepidemiologic research aimed at translating RCT evidence to real world data to better understand clinical practices patterns.
dc.subjectpediatric mental healthen_US
dc.subjectpredictionen_US
dc.subject.meshDepressionen_US
dc.subject.meshHealth Services Researchen_US
dc.subject.meshMental Healthen_US
dc.subject.meshPharmacoepidemiologyen_US
dc.subject.meshAdolescenten_US
dc.subject.meshChilden_US
dc.titleEarly Symptom Improvement as a Predictor of Antidepressant Response in Children and Adolescents Diagnosed with Depression: Translating Evidence from Randomized Controlled Trials to Community Practiceen_US
dc.typedissertationen_US
dc.date.updated2020-08-10T10:01:35Z
dc.language.rfc3066en
dc.contributor.advisordosReis, Susan
refterms.dateFOA2020-08-13T15:15:27Z


Files in this item

Thumbnail
Name:
Spence_umaryland_0373D_11182.pdf
Size:
4.857Mb
Format:
PDF

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record