Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Date
2005Journal
Child Abuse and NeglectPublisher
ElsevierType
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Objectives: To compare neglect defined by Child Protective Services official codes with neglect defined by a review of CPS narrative data, and to examine the validity of the different neglect measures using children's functioning at age 8 years. Methods: Data are from 740 children participating in a consortium of longitudinal studies on child abuse and neglect; 481 had at least one CPS report prior to age 8. CPS records were reviewed to ascertain both broad CPS types of neglect as well as specific subtypes of neglect using a modified version of the Maltreatment Classification System (MMCS). Frequencies of, and correlations among, the types and subtypes of neglect were examined. The validity of the neglect measures was evaluated by examining their relationships with children's functioning at age 8. Results: The CPS neglect types and MMCS subtypes were moderately correlated, as were the MMCS subtypes of neglect. In general, neglect was only modestly associated with children's functioning at age 8 (r2 = 1-4%), with few differences between the CPS neglect types and the MMCS subtypes. There were significant associations with children's total and externalizing behavior problems, impaired socialization, and impaired daily living skills. Among the specific subtypes, neglect of children's medical needs was related to externalizing behavior problems, impaired socialization, and impaired daily living skills. Neglect of children's hygiene needs was related to impaired socialization. Conclusion: The moderate correlations among CPS and MMCS types and subtypes of neglect and their similar associations with children's functioning suggest that the considerable effort involved in coding neglect subtypes from CPS narrative data may yield limited incremental knowledge regarding the types of neglect children experience and their sequelae. However, the MMCS does offer useful descriptive information on the nature of neglect children experience, and may guide future research and practice on optimal ways to conceptualize neglect. Copyright 2005 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Identifier to cite or link to this item
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-20544469626&doi=10.1016%2fj.chiabu.2003.09.024&partnerID=40&md5=e215b90664f3754f10f02861f2d80959; http://hdl.handle.net/10713/11893ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.chiabu.2003.09.024
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Describing maltreatment: do child protective service reports and research definitions agree?
- Authors: Runyan DK, Cox CE, Dubowitz H, Newton RR, Upadhyaya M, Kotch JB, Leeb RT, Everson MD, Knight ED
- Issue date: 2005 May
- Measurement of three major subtypes of child neglect.
- Authors: Dubowitz H, Pitts SC, Black MM
- Issue date: 2004 Nov
- Do allegations of emotional maltreatment predict developmental outcomes beyond that of other forms of maltreatment?
- Authors: Schneider MW, Ross A, Graham JC, Zielinski A
- Issue date: 2005 May
- Measuring the severity of child maltreatment.
- Authors: Litrownik AJ, Lau A, English DJ, Briggs E, Newton RR, Romney S, Dubowitz H
- Issue date: 2005 May
- The contribution of childhood emotional abuse to teen dating violence among child protective services-involved youth.
- Authors: Wekerle C, Leung E, Wall AM, MacMillan H, Boyle M, Trocme N, Waechter R
- Issue date: 2009 Jan