Primary care pediatricians' experience, comfort and competence in the evaluation and management of child maltreatment: Do we need child abuse experts?
Name:
Publisher version
View Source
Access full-text PDFOpen Access
View Source
Check access options
Check access options
Date
2009Journal
Child Abuse and NeglectPublisher
ElsevierType
Article
Metadata
Show full item recordAbstract
Objective: We assessed the self-reported experience, comfort and competence of primary care pediatricians in evaluating and managing child maltreatment (CM), in rendering opinions regarding the likelihood of CM, and in providing court testimony. We examined pediatricians' need for expert consultation when evaluating possible maltreatment. Methods: A questionnaire was mailed to 520 randomly selected AAP members. Pediatricians were asked how frequently they evaluated and reported children for suspected maltreatment, and whether child abuse pediatricians were available to and used by them. Pediatricians were asked to rate their knowledge, comfort and competence in the management of CM. Demographic information was also gathered. Pediatricians' experience with CM, their comfort, self-reported competence, and need for expert assistance is described. Logistic regression was used to assess factors that predicted pediatricians' sense of competence while controlling for covariates found to be significant in bivariate analyses. Results: One hundred forty-seven questionnaires were eligible for analysis. The majority of respondents had little experience evaluating and reporting suspected CM, and was interested in having expert consultation. While pediatricians often felt competent in conducting medical exams for suspected maltreatment, they felt less competent in rendering a definitive opinion, and did not generally feel competent to testify in court. Sense of competence was particularly low for sexual abuse. Increased practice experience and more courses in CM led to increased sense of competence in some areas. Conclusions: Pediatricians acknowledged many limitations to providing care to maltreated children, and expressed interest in subspecialist input. Practice implications: These findings add additional support to the American Board of Pediatrics' decision to create a Child Abuse Pediatrics subspecialty. The findings also indicate a need to ensure funding for fellowship training programs in this field. Copyright 2009 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.Identifier to cite or link to this item
https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-62349098712&doi=10.1016%2fj.chiabu.2008.09.003&partnerID=40&md5=589167aa1e2d2a4d08ab7c60d2405d86; http://hdl.handle.net/10713/11862ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
10.1016/j.chiabu.2008.09.003
Scopus Count
Collections
Related articles
- Reasonable suspicion: a study of Pennsylvania pediatricians regarding child abuse.
- Authors: Levi BH, Brown G
- Issue date: 2005 Jul
- A survey of pediatricians' attitudes and experiences with court in cases of child maltreatment.
- Authors: Theodore AD, Runyan DK
- Issue date: 2006 Dec
- Pediatricians' role in providing mental health care for children and adolescents: do pediatricians and child and adolescent psychiatrists agree?
- Authors: Heneghan A, Garner AS, Storfer-Isser A, Kortepeter K, Stein RE, Horwitz SM
- Issue date: 2008 Aug
- Well-child visits in the video age: pediatricians and the American Academy of Pediatrics' guidelines for children's media use.
- Authors: Gentile DA, Oberg C, Sherwood NE, Story M, Walsh DA, Hogan M, American Academy of Pediatrics
- Issue date: 2004 Nov
- Pediatrician characteristics associated with child abuse identification and reporting: results from a national survey of pediatricians.
- Authors: Flaherty EG, Sege R, Price LL, Christoffel KK, Norton DP, O'Connor KG
- Issue date: 2006 Nov