• Login
    View Item 
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles 2019
    • View Item
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles 2019
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UMB Digital ArchiveCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Participation and consultation engagement strategies have complementary roles: A case study of patient and public involvement in clinical practice guideline development

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Armstrong, M.J.
    Gronseth, G.S.
    Mullins, C.D.
    Date
    2019
    Journal
    Health Expectations
    Publisher
    Blackwell Publishing Ltd
    Type
    Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    See at
    https://doi.org/10.1111/hex.13018
    Abstract
    Background: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is recommended when developing high-quality clinical practice guidelines, but the effects of different PPI strategies are largely unstudied. Objective: To assess the impact of participation and consultation strategies on guideline question development. Design: Instrumental case study design. Setting and participants: This study used a clinical practice guideline in development by the American Academy of Neurology. A patient, two caregivers and a dementia advocate participated in the guideline development group alongside clinicians. The guideline protocol was posted for public consultation for 30 days. Interventions studied: Participation (patient representatives on the guideline development group) and consultation (public comment, survey) PPI strategies. Main outcome measures: Public comment responses and guideline development group meeting transcripts were analysed descriptively. Transcript quotes were compared to the conceptual model of PPI in guideline development. The effects of participation and consultation strategies within the guideline case were compared. Results: Participation strategies shaped discussions, set a patient-centred scope, highlighted personal aspects of disease, affected how professionals viewed PPI, identified issues overlooked by medical professionals, and contributed to selecting patient-relevant guideline populations and outcomes. Professionals responded to public comment more than patient representatives. Patient survey participants confirmed the priorities voiced by patient representatives on the guideline development group. Final guideline questions included populations and outcomes promoted by patient representatives despite negative feedback from professional public commenters. Discussion and conclusions: Participation and consultation PPI strategies have different advantages. Congruence between strategies increases the strength of the patient voice. Guideline developers should prioritize using both strategies for successful PPI. Copyright 2019 The Authors.
    Sponsors
    This work was funded by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ K08HS24159).
    Keyword
    amyloid PET imaging
    clinical practice guidelines
    dementia
    guideline adherence
    guidelines as topic
    patient and public involvement
    patient participation
    patient-centred care
    Identifier to cite or link to this item
    https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85077908036&doi=10.1111%2fhex.13018&partnerID=40&md5=10059dfbdb7f1f5b9b7dda632cb738a2; http://hdl.handle.net/10713/11690
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1111/hex.13018
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UMB Open Access Articles 2019

    entitlement

     
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Policies | Contact Us | UMB Health Sciences & Human Services Library
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.