• Login
    View Item 
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles 2019
    • View Item
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles 2019
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UMB Digital ArchiveCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Secondary Fracture Prevention: Consensus Clinical Recommendations from a Multistakeholder Coalition

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Conley, R.B.
    Adib, G.
    Hochberg, M.C.
    Date
    2019
    Journal
    Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
    Publisher
    John Wiley and Sons Inc.
    Type
    Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    See at
    https://doi.org/10.1002/jbmr.3877
    Abstract
    Osteoporosis-related fractures are undertreated, due in part to misinformation about recommended approaches to patient care and discrepancies among treatment guidelines. To help bridge this gap and improve patient outcomes, the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research assembled a multistakeholder coalition to develop clinical recommendations for the optimal prevention of secondary fracture among people aged 65 years and older with a hip or vertebral fracture. The coalition developed 13 recommendations (7 primary and 6 secondary) strongly supported by the empirical literature. The coalition recommends increased communication with patients regarding fracture risk, mortality and morbidity outcomes, and fracture risk reduction. Risk assessment (including fall history) should occur at regular intervals with referral to physical and/or occupational therapy as appropriate. Oral, intravenous, and subcutaneous pharmacotherapies are efficacious and can reduce risk of future fracture. Patients need education, however, about the benefits and risks of both treatment and not receiving treatment. Oral bisphosphonates alendronate and risedronate are first-line options and are generally well tolerated; otherwise, intravenous zoledronic acid and subcutaneous denosumab can be considered. Anabolic agents are expensive but may be beneficial for selected patients at high risk. Optimal duration of pharmacotherapy is unknown but because the risk for second fractures is highest in the early post-fracture period, prompt treatment is recommended. Adequate dietary or supplemental vitamin D and calcium intake should be assured. Individuals being treated for osteoporosis should be reevaluated for fracture risk routinely, including via patient education about osteoporosis and fractures and monitoring for adverse treatment effects. Patients should be strongly encouraged to avoid tobacco, consume alcohol in moderation at most, and engage in regular exercise and fall prevention strategies. Finally, referral to endocrinologists or other osteoporosis specialists may be warranted for individuals who experience repeated fracture or bone loss and those with complicating comorbidities (eg, hyperparathyroidism, chronic kidney disease).
    Sponsors
    This study was funded by Bayer, Gilead Sciences, AbbVie, Amgen and Takeda Pharmaceuticals U.S.A.
    Keyword
    Aging
    Anabolics
    Antiresorptives
    Osteoporosis
    Secondary Fracture Prevention
    Identifier to cite or link to this item
    https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85076373399&doi=10.1002%2fjbmr.3877&partnerID=40&md5=df070e59c8b36fa8839815edd816c573; http://hdl.handle.net/10713/11552
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1002/jbmr.3877
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UMB Open Access Articles 2019

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Secondary Fracture Prevention: Consensus Clinical Recommendations from a Multistakeholder Coalition.
    • Authors: Conley RB, Adib G, Adler RA, Åkesson KE, Alexander IM, Amenta KC, Blank RD, Brox WT, Carmody EE, Chapman-Novakofski K, Clarke BL, Cody KM, Cooper C, Crandall CJ, Dirschl DR, Eagen TJ, Elderkin AL, Fujita M, Greenspan SL, Halbout P, Hochberg MC, Javaid M, Jeray KJ, Kearns AE, King T, Koinis TF, Koontz JS, Kužma M, Lindsey C, Lorentzon M, Lyritis GP, Michaud LB, Miciano A, Morin SN, Mujahid N, Napoli N, Olenginski TP, Puzas JE, Rizou S, Rosen CJ, Saag K, Thompson E, Tosi LL, Tracer H, Khosla S, Kiel DP
    • Issue date: 2020 Apr
    • Summary of AHRQ's comparative effectiveness review of treatment to prevent fractures in men and women with low bone density or osteoporosis: update of the 2007 report.
    • Authors: Levis S, Theodore G
    • Issue date: 2012 May
    • Authors: Swedish Council on Health Technology Assessment
    • Issue date: 2003 Oct 14
    • Utilization of DXA Bone Mineral Densitometry in Ontario: An Evidence-Based Analysis.
    • Authors: Medical Advisory Secretariat.
    • Issue date: 2006
    • Suicidal Ideation
    • Authors: Harmer B, Lee S, Duong TvH, Saadabadi A
    • Issue date: 2020 Jan
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Policies | Contact Us | UMB Health Sciences & Human Services Library
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.