JournalValue in Health
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractBackground Professional societies and other organizations have recently taken a visible role trying to define treatment value via value frameworks and assessments, providing payer or provider recommendations, and potentially impacting patient access. Patient perspectives routinely differ from those of other stakeholders. Yet, it is not always apparent that patients were engaged in value framework development or assessment. Objectives To describe the development and content of the National Health Council's (NHC's) Rubric, a tool that includes criteria for evaluation of value frameworks specifically with regard to patient-centeredness and meaningful patient engagement. Methods The NHC held a multistakeholder, invitational roundtable in Washington, DC, in 2016. Participants reviewed existing patient-engagement rubrics, discussed experiences with value frameworks, debated and thematically grouped hallmark patient-centeredness characteristics, and developed illustrative examples of the characteristics. These materials were organized into the rubric, and subsequently vetted via multistakeholder peer review. Results The resulting rubric describes six domains of patient-centered value frameworks: partnership, transparency, inclusiveness, diversity, outcomes, and data sources. Each domain includes specific examples illustrating how patient engagement and patient-centeredness can be operationalized in value framework processes. Conclusions The NHC multistakeholder roundtable's recommendations are captured in the NHC's Rubric to assess value framework and model patient-centeredness and patient engagement. The Rubric is a tool that will be refined over time on the basis of feedback from patient, patient group, framework developer, and other stakeholder-use experiences.
Keywordclinical decision making
patient outcome assessment
Identifier to cite or link to this itemhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85013635863&doi=10.1016%2fj.jval.2016.11.014&partnerID=40&md5=535d2305218041f433a9a8ccf5b35db8; http://hdl.handle.net/10713/11320
- The PCORI Engagement Rubric: Promising Practices for Partnering in Research.
- Authors: Sheridan S, Schrandt S, Forsythe L, Hilliard TS, Paez KA, Advisory Panel on Patient Engagement (2013 inaugural panel).
- Issue date: 2017 Mar
- Patient Governance in a Patient-Powered Research Network for Adult Rheumatologic Conditions.
- Authors: Nowell WB, Curtis JR, Crow-Hercher R
- Issue date: 2018 Oct
- Emerging lessons from regional and state innovation in value-based payment reform: balancing collaboration and disruptive innovation.
- Authors: Conrad DA, Grembowski D, Hernandez SE, Lau B, Marcus-Smith M
- Issue date: 2014 Sep
- Value Assessment at the Point of Care: Incorporating Patient Values throughout Care Delivery and a Draft Taxonomy of Patient Values.
- Authors: Armstrong MJ, Mullins CD
- Issue date: 2017 Feb
- Measuring the Value of New Drugs: Validity and Reliability of 4 Value Assessment Frameworks in the Oncology Setting.
- Authors: Bentley TGK, Cohen JT, Elkin EB, Huynh J, Mukherjea A, Neville TH, Mei M, Copher R, Knoth R, Popescu I, Lee J, Zambrano JM, Broder MS
- Issue date: 2017 Jun