Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorMattingly, T.J., II
dc.contributor.authorRomanelli, F.
dc.contributor.authorCain, J.
dc.date.accessioned2019-11-01T12:49:36Z
dc.date.available2019-11-01T12:49:36Z
dc.date.issued2017
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85038433502&doi=10.5688%2fajpe6071&partnerID=40&md5=bcec495c18f9bd28550918b31e67b86f
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/11308
dc.description.abstractObjective. To define quality and associated metrics related to Doctor of Pharmacy degree programs. Methods. A three round Delphi process and online survey tool were employed to constitute and query an expert panel of randomly selected pharmacy deans representing a proportional share of public and private schools. Participants were asked about measures used to evaluate the quality of their schools; agreement was assessed for each quality category and metric identified; rankings were reported in order of importance. Results. Deans from 15 public pharmacy schools and 17 private pharmacy schools agreed to participate. Nine quality categories and 35 specific quality metrics were identified. Both public and private school leaders identified and agreed on nine categories of quality measures, with "placement" ranked as the most important measurement category. Conclusion. Identifying categories and metrics to assess quality may provide a foundation from which to compare quality across institutions.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe6071en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.publisherAmerican Association of Colleges of Pharmacyen_US
dc.relation.ispartofAmerican Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
dc.subjectBenchmarkingen_US
dc.subjectEducation qualityen_US
dc.subjectPharmacy schoolen_US
dc.titleMeasuring up - Defining the quality of PharmD programsen_US
dc.typeArticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.5688/ajpe6071
dc.identifier.pmid29302088


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record