• Login
    View Item 
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles 2017
    • View Item
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles 2017
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UMB Digital ArchiveCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    Value Assessment at the Point of Care: Incorporating Patient Values throughout Care Delivery and a Draft Taxonomy of Patient Values

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Thumbnail
    Name:
    Publisher version
    View Source
    Access full-text PDFOpen Access
    View Source
    Check access options
    Check access options
    Author
    Armstrong, M.J.
    Mullins, C.D.
    Date
    2017
    Journal
    Value in Health
    Publisher
    Elsevier Ltd
    Type
    Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    See at
    https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.008
    Abstract
    Incorporation of patient values is a key element of patient-centered care, but consistent incorporation of patient values at the point of care is lacking. Shared decision making encourages incorporation of patient values in decision making, but associated tools often lack guidance on value assessment. In addition, focusing on patient values relating only to specific decisions misses an opportunity for a more holistic approach to value assessment that could impact other aspects of clinical encounters, including health care planning, communication, and stakeholder involvement. In this commentary, we propose a taxonomy of values underlying patient decision making and provide examples of how these impact provision of health care. The taxonomy describes four categories of patient values: global, decisional, situational, and external. Global values are personal values impacting decision making at a universal level and can include value traits and life priorities. Decisional values are the values traditionally conceptualized in decision making, including considerations such as efficacy, toxicity, quality of life, convenience, and cost. Situational values are values tied to a specific moment in time that modify patients' existing global and decisional values. Finally, discussion of external values acknowledges that many patients consider values other than their own when making decisions. Recognizing the breadth of values impacting patient decision making has implications for both overall health care delivery and shared decision making because value assessments focusing only on decisional values may miss important patient considerations. This draft taxonomy highlights different values impacting decision making and facilitates a more complete value assessment at the point of care.
    Keyword
    decision making
    shared decision making
    taxonomy
    value
    Identifier to cite or link to this item
    https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85013658766&doi=10.1016%2fj.jval.2016.11.008&partnerID=40&md5=23fbac56d0960ede1d140c00be1076d7; http://hdl.handle.net/10713/10934
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1016/j.jval.2016.11.008
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UMB Open Access Articles 2017

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • Integrating Patient Preference into Treatment Decisions for Men with Prostate Cancer at the Point of Care.
    • Authors: Johnson DC, Mueller DE, Deal AM, Dunn MW, Smith AB, Woods ME, Wallen EM, Pruthi RS, Nielsen ME
    • Issue date: 2016 Dec
    • The patient experience of patient-centered communication with nurses in the hospital setting: a qualitative systematic review protocol.
    • Authors: Newell S, Jordan Z
    • Issue date: 2015 Jan
    • Why do some patients prefer to leave decisions up to the doctor: lack of self-efficacy or a matter of trust?
    • Authors: Chawla N, Arora NK
    • Issue date: 2013 Dec
    • Patient preference for involvement, experienced involvement, decisional conflict, and satisfaction with physician: a structural equation model test.
    • Authors: Hölzel LP, Kriston L, Härter M
    • Issue date: 2013 Jun 25
    • Adolescents' preferences for treatment decisional involvement during their cancer.
    • Authors: Weaver MS, Baker JN, Gattuso JS, Gibson DV, Sykes AD, Hinds PS
    • Issue date: 2015 Dec 15
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Policies | Contact Us | UMB Health Sciences & Human Services Library
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.