Key mechanisms by which post-ICU activities can improve in-ICU care: results of the international THRIVE collaboratives
JournalIntensive Care Medicine
MetadataShow full item record
AbstractObjective: To identify the key mechanisms that clinicians perceive improve care in the intensive care unit (ICU), as a result of their involvement in post-ICU programs. Methods: Qualitative inquiry via focus groups and interviews with members of the Society of Critical Care Medicine’s THRIVE collaborative sites (follow-up clinics and peer support). Framework analysis was used to synthesize and interpret the data. Results: Five key mechanisms were identified as drivers of improvement back into the ICU: (1) identifying otherwise unseen targets for ICU quality improvement or education programs—new ideas for quality improvement were generated and greater attention paid to detail in clinical care. (2) Creating a new role for survivors in the ICU—former patients and family members adopted an advocacy or peer volunteer role. (3) Inviting critical care providers to the post-ICU program to educate, sensitize, and motivate them—clinician peers and trainees were invited to attend as a helpful learning strategy to gain insights into post-ICU care requirements. (4) Changing clinician’s own understanding of patient experience—there appeared to be a direct individual benefit from working in post-ICU programs. (5) Improving morale and meaningfulness of ICU work—this was achieved by closing the feedback loop to ICU clinicians regarding patient and family outcomes. Conclusions: The follow-up of patients and families in post-ICU care settings is perceived to improve care within the ICU via five key mechanisms. Further research is required in this novel area. Copyright 2019, The Author(s).
Identifier to cite or link to this itemhttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85067023644&doi=10.1007%2fs00134-019-05647-5&partnerID=40&md5=ca6d77acbb4fa06b362cb6b23f6fadc6; http://hdl.handle.net/10713/10671
- Enablers and Barriers to Implementing ICU Follow-Up Clinics and Peer Support Groups Following Critical Illness: The Thrive Collaboratives.
- Authors: Haines KJ, McPeake J, Hibbert E, Boehm LM, Aparanji K, Bakhru RN, Bastin AJ, Beesley SJ, Beveridge L, Butcher BW, Drumright K, Eaton TL, Farley T, Firshman P, Fritschle A, Holdsworth C, Hope AA, Johnson A, Kenes MT, Khan BA, Kloos JA, Kross EK, Mactavish P, Meyer J, Montgomery-Yates A, Quasim T, Saft HL, Slack A, Stollings J, Weinhouse G, Whitten J, Netzer G, Hopkins RO, Mikkelsen ME, Iwashyna TJ, Sevin CM
- Issue date: 2019 Sep
- Quality of care in the intensive care unit from the perspective of patient's relatives: development and psychometric evaluation of the consumer quality index 'R-ICU'.
- Authors: Rensen A, van Mol MM, Menheere I, Nijkamp MD, Verhoogt E, Maris B, Manders W, Vloet L, Verharen L
- Issue date: 2017 Jan 24
- From breaking point to breakthrough during the ICU stay: A qualitative study of family members' experiences of long-term intensive care patients' pathways towards survival.
- Authors: Haugdahl HS, Eide R, Alexandersen I, Paulsby TE, Stjern B, Lund SB, Haugan G
- Issue date: 2018 Oct
- Implementation of an Academic-to-Community Hospital Intensive Care Unit Quality Improvement Program. Qualitative Analysis of Multilevel Facilitators and Barriers.
- Authors: Johnson EE, Sterba KR, Goodwin AJ, Warr EH, Beeks R, Zapka JM, Ford DW
- Issue date: 2019 Jul
- A qualitative study of the variable effects of audit and feedback in the ICU.
- Authors: Sinuff T, Muscedere J, Rozmovits L, Dale CM, Scales DC
- Issue date: 2015 Jun