• Login
    View Item 
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles 2019
    • View Item
    •   UMB Digital Archive
    • UMB Open Access Articles
    • UMB Open Access Articles 2019
    • View Item
    JavaScript is disabled for your browser. Some features of this site may not work without it.

    Browse

    All of UMB Digital ArchiveCommunitiesPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjectsThis CollectionPublication DateAuthorsTitlesSubjects

    My Account

    LoginRegister

    Statistics

    Display statistics

    IGNITE network: Response of patients to genomic medicine interventions

    • CSV
    • RefMan
    • EndNote
    • BibTex
    • RefWorks
    Author
    Orlando, L.A.
    Voils, C.
    Horowitz, C.R.
    Date
    2019
    Journal
    Molecular Genetics and Genomic Medicine
    Publisher
    Wiley-Blackwell
    Type
    Article
    
    Metadata
    Show full item record
    See at
    https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.636
    Abstract
    Background: The IGNITE network funds six genomic medicine projects. Though interventions varied, we hypothesized that synergies across projects could be leveraged to better understand the participant experiences with genomic medicine interventions. Therefore, we performed cross‐network analyses to identify associations between participant demographics and attitudes toward the intervention (attitude), plan to share results (share), and quality of life (QOL). Methods: Data collection for demographics, attitude, share, and QOL surveys were standardized across projects. Recruitment and survey administration varied by each project's protocol. Results: Participants (N = 6,817) were 67.2% (N = 4,584) female, and 37.4% (N = 3,544) were minority. Mean age = 54.0 (sd 14.a). Younger participants were as follows: (1) more positive in attitude pre‐intervention (1.15‐fold decrease/10‐year age increase (OR)) and more negative after (1.14‐fold increase OR); (2) higher in QOL pre‐intervention (1.07‐fold increase OR) and postintervention; (3) more likely to share results (1.12‐fold increase OR). Race was significant when sharing results (white participants increased OR = 1.88), but not for change in QOL pre–postintervention or attitude. Conclusion: Our findings demonstrate the feasibility of this approach and identified a few key themes which are as follows: age was consistently significant across the three outcomes, whereas race had less of an impact than expected. However, these are only associations and thus warrant further study. Copyright 2019 The Authors.
    Sponsors
    National Human Genome Research Institute, Grant/Award Number: U01 HG007253, U01 HG007269, U01 HG007278, U01 HG007282, U01 HG007762 and U01 HG007775; National Institutes of Health, Grant/Award Number: K01 HL141690 and KL2 TR001429 ; HSR&D Research Career Scientist award, Grant/Award Number: RCS 14-443
    Keyword
    attitude
    common measures
    genomic medicine
    IGNITE
    plan to share
    quality of life
    Identifier to cite or link to this item
    https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85065399979&doi=10.1002%2fmgg3.636&partnerID=40&md5=a2930251c435bbf9588592963f6c6ed6; http://hdl.handle.net/10713/10661
    ae974a485f413a2113503eed53cd6c53
    10.1002/mgg3.636
    Scopus Count
    Collections
    UMB Open Access Articles 2019

    entitlement

    Related articles

    • The IGNITE network: a model for genomic medicine implementation and research.
    • Authors: Weitzel KW, Alexander M, Bernhardt BA, Calman N, Carey DJ, Cavallari LH, Field JR, Hauser D, Junkins HA, Levin PA, Levy K, Madden EB, Manolio TA, Odgis J, Orlando LA, Pyeritz R, Wu RR, Shuldiner AR, Bottinger EP, Denny JC, Dexter PR, Flockhart DA, Horowitz CR, Johnson JA, Kimmel SE, Levy MA, Pollin TI, Ginsburg GS, IGNITE Network.
    • Issue date: 2016 Jan 5
    • Adults' perceptions of genetic counseling and genetic testing.
    • Authors: Houfek JF, Soltis-Vaughan BS, Atwood JR, Reiser GM, Schaefer GB
    • Issue date: 2015 Feb
    • Perceptions and understanding of genetics and genetic eye disease and attitudes to genetic testing and gene therapy in a primary eye care setting.
    • Authors: Ganne P, Garrioch R, Votruba M
    • Issue date: 2015 Mar
    • Developing a common framework for evaluating the implementation of genomic medicine interventions in clinical care: the IGNITE Network's Common Measures Working Group.
    • Authors: Orlando LA, Sperber NR, Voils C, Nichols M, Myers RA, Wu RR, Rakhra-Burris T, Levy KD, Levy M, Pollin TI, Guan Y, Horowitz CR, Ramos M, Kimmel SE, McDonough CW, Madden EB, Damschroder LJ
    • Issue date: 2018 Jun
    • Utilization of Genetic Counseling after Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Findings from the Impact of Personal Genomics (PGen) Study.
    • Authors: Koeller DR, Uhlmann WR, Carere DA, Green RC, Roberts JS, PGen Study Group.
    • Issue date: 2017 Dec
    DSpace software (copyright © 2002 - 2021)  DuraSpace
    Quick Guide | Policies | Contact Us | UMB Health Sciences & Human Services Library
    Open Repository is a service operated by 
    Atmire NV
     

    Export search results

    The export option will allow you to export the current search results of the entered query to a file. Different formats are available for download. To export the items, click on the button corresponding with the preferred download format.

    By default, clicking on the export buttons will result in a download of the allowed maximum amount of items.

    To select a subset of the search results, click "Selective Export" button and make a selection of the items you want to export. The amount of items that can be exported at once is similarly restricted as the full export.

    After making a selection, click one of the export format buttons. The amount of items that will be exported is indicated in the bubble next to export format.