Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorBarth, J.
dc.contributor.authorKern, A.
dc.contributor.authorWitt, Claudia M.
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-05T17:00:33Z
dc.date.available2019-08-05T17:00:33Z
dc.date.issued2019
dc.identifier.urihttps://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85067474284&doi=10.1136%2fbmjopen-2018-026712&partnerID=40&md5=ca604fb0ef49371a722ca533112e7576
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/10247
dc.description.abstractObjective To develop a short self-report instrument for the assessment of expectations (Expectation for Treatment Scale(ETS)) using acupuncture as a case example. Design A cross-sectional assessment with retest after 1 week. Setting A web-based survey with patients suffering from pain. Methods In a three-step approach, we reduced the initially collected number of items from 17 to 9 and to 5, including expectations about coping ability, vitality, physical health and reduction of patient complaints. Items were selected according to internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha); convergent and divergent validities with related constructs (optimism, pessimism, resilience, perceived sensitivity to medicines, depression and others); 1-week retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC)); and exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Results A total of 102 patients suffering from pain were included, and 54 of these patients completed the retest assessment. The final version of the ETS consisted of five items and had an excellent Cronbach's alpha (0.90), with 72.33% variance on one single factor. Depression, pessimism and perceived sensitivity to medicines showed positive correlations with our expectation measure (r=0.23, r=0.20 and r=0.34, respectively); the correlation between the ETS and optimism was low (r=-0.07) and no correlation between the ETS and resilience was found (r=-0.07). Convergent validity was confirmed with a high correlation (r>0.90) between ETS and a treatment-specific measure of expectations. The retest ICC was 0.86, which showed high stability over 1 week. A CFA (n=439) with data from patients with low back pain confirmed the single-factor structure of the instrument. Conclusion The ETS showed strong psychometric properties and covered a distinct construct. As the next step, the ETS might be implemented in different clinical conditions and settings to investigate psychometrics and its predictive power for treatment outcomes.en_US
dc.description.sponsorshipFunding This study was funded by the Swiss National Science Foundation (Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung), grant number 105319_159833.en_US
dc.description.urihttps://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026712en_US
dc.language.isoen-USen_US
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_US
dc.relation.ispartofBMJ Open
dc.subjectacupunctureen_US
dc.subjectassessmenten_US
dc.subjectexpectationsen_US
dc.subjectoptimismen_US
dc.subjectpainen_US
dc.subjectplaceboen_US
dc.titleAssessment of patients' expectations: Development and validation of the Expectation for Treatment Scale (ETS)en_US
dc.typearticleen_US
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2018-026712
dc.identifier.pmid31213446


This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record