Show simple item record

dc.contributor.authorDia, David A.
dc.date.accessioned2012-03-07T18:27:15Z
dc.date.available2012-03-07T18:27:15Z
dc.date.issued2006
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/10713/1012
dc.descriptionUniversity of Maryland, Baltimore. Social Work. Ph.D. 2006en_US
dc.description.abstractAnxiety disorders are a common and can cause significant impairment in an adolescent's life (Last et al., 1997). Psychosocial treatments, particularly cognitive behavioral therapy, are effective in treating anxiety disorders, but there are many adolescents who have participated in empirically-based psychosocial treatment approaches who are still not improving (Bernstein & Kinlan, 1997; In-Albon & Schneider, 2004). The tripartite model of anxiety and depression was developed to try to account for the high comorbidity between anxiety and depression. The models states that there is a common component to anxiety and depression, which is negative affectivity, and unique components to anxiety, physiological arousal, and depression, low positive affectivity or anhendonia. The purpose of this dissertation study was to increase the knowledge base on the phenomenology of anxiety disorders. The objectives were to: (1) examine gender and ethnic differences in positive and negative affectivity and depressive and anxiety symptomology; and (2) to clarify the relationship between anxiety and the components of anxiety sensitivity within the tripartite model of anxiety and depression. This study consisted of mailed survey to a simple random sample of 315 adolescents between the ages of 12 and 18 who were in treatment for an anxiety and/or depressive disorder. A total of 187 completed surveys were returned for a 61.1% response rate. Adolescents filled out the Positive and Negative Affectivity Scale, Childhood Anxiety Sensitivity Index, and the Revised Child Anxiety and Depression Scale. There was not a statistically significant difference found between the ethnic subgroups (i.e., Hispanic/Latino or any ethnic subgroup) and the Caucasian subgroup on positive and negative affectivity and anxiety and depression. There was also no statistically significant difference found between males and females on negative and positive affectivity and anxiety and depression. A modified tripartite model of anxiety and depression fit the data the best with negative affectivity being related to anxiety and depression, low positive affectivity being related to depression, and physiological arousal being related to anxiety, and anxiety being related to depression. Another modified tripartite model, which examined the specific components of anxiety sensitivity related to specific anxiety disorders, did not fit the data as well as the earlier model. This study did find difference between ethnic subgroups and Caucasian adolescents or between males and females, which suggests there are more similarities than difference between these various subgroups. Additionally, the modified tripartite model supported the role of negative affectivity being related to anxiety and depression and there are unique components, physiological arousal and anhendonia, related to anxiety and depression. This study uniquely found that anxiety was related to depression, suggesting a mixed anxiety and depressive state.en_US
dc.language.isoen_USen_US
dc.subjectPsychology, Clinicalen_US
dc.subject.meshAdolescenten_US
dc.subject.meshAnxiety Disorders--psychologyen_US
dc.subject.meshComorbidityen_US
dc.subject.meshDepressionen_US
dc.subject.meshSocial Worken_US
dc.titleThe tripartite model of anxiety and depression: Role of the factors of anxiety sensitivity in anxiety and depressionen_US
dc.typedissertationen_US
dc.contributor.advisorHarrington, Donna
dc.identifier.ispublishedYes
dc.description.urinameFull Text
 Find Full text

This item appears in the following Collection(s)

Show simple item record