Loading...
No correction, no retraction, no apology, no comment: paroxetine trial reanalysis raises questions about institutional responsibility
Authors
Doshi, Peter
Doshi, Peter
Advisor
Date
2015-09-16
Embargo until
Language
Book title
Publisher
BMJ Publishing Group
Peer Reviewed
Type
Article
Research Area
Jurisdiction
Collections
Other Titles
Abstract
Data Availibility
Data / Code Location
Table of Contents
Description
As new data analysis adds weight to calls for retraction of a paper on paroxetine in adolescents, the author examines the resistance to action of a professional society, its journal, and an Ivy League university
Citations
Altmetric:
Series/Report No.
Sponsors
Rights/Terms
Citation
Doshi, P. (2015). No correction, no retraction, no apology, no comment: paroxetine trial reanalysis raises questions about insitutional responsibility. BMJ, 351. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.h4629
Keyword
Restoring Invisible and Abandoned Trials
RIAT
Study 329
Clinical Trials as Topic--ethics
Conflict of Interest
Drug Industry--ethics
Paroxetine
Ethics, Institutional
Drug Evaluation--ethics
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Brown University
GlaxoSmithKline
Pharmaceutical industry--Corrupt practices
RIAT
Study 329
Clinical Trials as Topic--ethics
Conflict of Interest
Drug Industry--ethics
Paroxetine
Ethics, Institutional
Drug Evaluation--ethics
American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry
Brown University
GlaxoSmithKline
Pharmaceutical industry--Corrupt practices