Reducing Unit-Acquired Pressure Injuries on a Cardiac Surgery Progressive Care Unit
Authors
McGinn, Amy E.
Advisor
Date
Embargo until
Language
Book title
Publisher
Peer Reviewed
Type
Research Area
Jurisdiction
Collections
Files
Other Titles
See at
Abstract
Background: Consequences of pressure injuries can be emotional and physical, including pain, body image distortion, increased risk for infection, increased length of stay in the hospital, and death. Pressure injuries create a significant economic burden for organizations and individuals. Organizations that have the highest incidences of pressure injuries receive less reimbursement for services. Local Problem: Prior to project implementation, 3 pressure injuries were found on the cardiac surgery progressive care unit during a 13-week period. The cardiac surgery progressive care unit in a large academic medical center in the mid-Atlantic region was responsible for 66% of the pressure injuries. The purpose of this quality improvement project was to implement and evaluate the effectiveness of a pressure injury prevention bundle on a cardiac surgery progressive care unit over a 13-week period using the Model for Improvement as a framework for implementation. Intervention: The pressure injury prevention bundle consisted of four steps: the Braden score, a two-nurse skin assessment on admission, a pressure-reducing surface, and a consult to the wound, ostomy, and continence nurse. Two-hundred one subjects were evaluated (n=201). The intervention was evaluated by a before-after design, comparing the number of avoidable unitacquired pressure injuries before project implementation, to after implementation of the PUPB. Results: Post-implementation, 4 pressure injuries were found on the cardiac surgery progressive care unit, but only 25% of the pressure injuries were determined to be the unit's responsibility, and 75% of the pressure injuries were determined to have occurred prior to admission to the unit. A nurse did not complete the two-nurse skin assessment on the one patient who developed a pressure injury during this project timeframe. The pressure injury was discovered 25.5 hours after admission to the unit, deeming it the cardiac surgery progressive care unit's responsibility. Conclusions: The pressure injury prevention bundle should be a standard of care for all new patient admissions. When all of these factors are used together in a bundle, this project demonstrates that the unit could have zero unit-acquired pressure injuries.
